SynthesisBMJ open2025
Superior vena cava isolation added to pulmonary vein isolation enhances outcomes in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Empirical Superior Vena Cava Isolation Added to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of tumor immunotherapy on kidney injury and multi-organ outcomes: a mechanistic and clinical perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection for '2025
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding Superior Vena Cava Isolation (SVCI) to Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).
designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, supplemented with Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to assess evidence sufficiency. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) and Web of Science for relevant studies published up to 13 July 2025. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included prospective RCTs comparing SVCI+PVI versus PVI alone in adults with drug-refractory PAF, with at least 3 months of follow-up and reporting on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and procedural complications. Case reports, reviews, observational studies, editorials, expert opinions and non-RCT studies were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration and Evidence Project tools. A meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models, and TSA was conducted to evaluate the conclusiveness of evidence. Findings were summarised in GRADE evidence profiles and synthesised qualitatively.
resultsThree RCTs involving 332 patients were included. The addition of SVCI to PVI significantly reduced AF recurrence compared with PVI alone (Risk Ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91, p=0.02; I² = 0%, P_heterogeneity=0.79) at a mean 12-month follow-up. TSA confirmed that the current evidence is sufficient. There were no significant differences in procedural complications between groups (Risk Difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.03, p=0.99; I² = 0%, P_heterogeneity=0.96).
conclusionsAdding SVCI to PVI for PAF ablation significantly reduces AF recurrence without increasing procedural risks. TSA confirms the robustness of the findings, supporting the potential integration of SVCI into routine clinical practice for PAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.