Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40921632›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

INDIGO randomised controlled digital clinical trial: INvestigating DIgital outcomes and quality of life in cancer survivors - a study protocol.

Kerlann Le Calvez, Jonathan J Gregory, Jacqui Gath, Pete Wheatstone, Laura Ashley, Owen Chinembiri, Anthony Cunliffe, Garry Davenport, Kendall Jamieson Gilmore, Katri Langel and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06095024 (INDIGO Community Participant Led Electronic Completion of PROMs and PREMs for Patients Living With and Beyond Cancer in the Community), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06095024 unknown statusnot on this map

INDIGO Community Participant Led Electronic Completion of PROMs and PREMs for Patients Living With and Beyond Cancer in the Community

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2023 to 2025Enrolled20,000ConditionsCancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kerlann Le CalvezRadiotherapy Department, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England, UK kerlann.lecalvez@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1965-2661
Jonathan J GregoryComputational Oncology Laboratory, Imperial College London, London, England, UK.
Jacqui GathComputational Oncology Laboratory, Imperial College London, London, England, UK.
Pete WheatstoneUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
Laura AshleyLeeds Beckett University, Leeds, England, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9439-3778
Owen ChinembiriNHS Race and Health Observatory, London, England, UK.
Anthony CunliffeMacmillan Cancer Support, London, England, UK.
Garry DavenportCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, UK.
Kendall Jamieson GilmoreNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK.
Katri LangelSweet Deal SL, Barcelona, Spain.
Clara MiglioMacmillan Cancer Support, London, England, UK.
Lillie Pakzad-ShahabiRadiotherapy Department, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England, UK.
Danush PadmasriComputational Oncology Laboratory, Imperial College London, London, England, UK.
Danny RutaGuy's Hospital Cancer Centre, London, England, UK.
Helen WilliamsThe Word Desk, Bicester, England, UK.
Matthew WilliamsRadiotherapy Department, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are estimated to be 3.4 million patients in the UK living after a diagnosis of cancer. We know very little about their quality of life or healthcare usage. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are tools which help to translate a patient's quality of life into measurable categories, but how to do this at scale remains underexplored. The study employs a randomised design to assess different engagement strategies for optimising participation, data linkage and questionnaire completion in Northwest London and then nationally, with appropriate research approvals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have designed and implemented an online, patient-completed, randomised observational trial. We will pilot it in Northwest London before national roll-out, using initially the General Practice (GP) record of a cancer diagnosis and then exploring the use of social media. The primary objective is to explore the feasibility of recruiting participants via self-identification or contact from the primary care research network and obtaining consent to link participants' PROMs responses to their cancer registry records. Data collection occurs through a secure platform, with participants directly responsible for data entry. There is no formal target sample size because this is a feasibility study, and we want to explore how many patients we can recruit. Analyses will be conducted using descriptive statistics, repeated measures multilevel modelling and machine learning techniques. If a substantial difference in responses between randomisation arms is detected, ineffective strategies will be removed. If no clear difference is observed, recruitment will continue with periodic reviews based on response rates and data completeness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Study Coordination Centre has obtained approval from the London-Surrey Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority. We will publish and disseminate the results in local, national and international meetings, in peer-reviewed journals, on social media and on websites.It has been registered under 'Investigating Digital Outcomes for Cancer Survivors in the Community' (NCT06095024). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06095024: Investigating Digital Outcomes for Cancer Survivors in the Community.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSocial MediaHumansLondonRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical ProtocolsDigital TechnologyONCOLOGYPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeRandomised Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID40921632
PMCPMC12421152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.