ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Impact of a 24/7 on-site percutaneous coronary intervention team strategy on door-to-wire time.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend that the door-to-wire (D2W) time should be <90 min in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study evaluated the effect of a 24/7 on-site PCI team strategy on the D2W time.
methodsIn this single-centre, retrospective study, patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI within 1 year before (control group, n=143) and 1 year after (intervention group, n=96) implementing a 24/7 on-site PCI team strategy were enrolled. This strategy required that the PCI team was always available in hospital to minimise the time required to make the catheterisation laboratory ready for PCI. The primary endpoint was the D2W time, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of delayed PCI (D2W time ≥90 min) and the on-site time of the PCI team members. Multivariate analysis was conducted to determine the independent predictors of delayed PCI in the intervention group.
resultsThe D2W time was shorter (52 vs 97 min, p<0.001), the rate of delayed PCI was lower (19.8% vs 55.2%, p<0.001), but the on-site time of the PCI team members (35 040 vs 9960 hours) was longer in the intervention group than in the control group. Time-to-obtain electrocardiogram >10 min (p=0.027) and time-to-make STEMI diagnosis >9 min (p
conclusionsImplementing a 24/7 on-site PCI team strategy was associated with reductions in the D2W time and the rate of delayed PCI but an increase in the on-site time of the PCI team members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.