Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40921412›Full record

ReviewArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2025

Which are the options and dosages for clobazam shortages on epilepsy treatment? Review of literature and survey of specialists.

Lécio Figueira Pinto, Guilherme Simone Mendonça, Carlos Alberto Mantovani Guerreiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lécio Figueira PintoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2694-5120
Guilherme Simone MendonçaHospital Santa Isabel, Blumenau SC, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0000-5599-9120
Carlos Alberto Mantovani GuerreiroUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Campinas SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9381-8674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clobazam (CLB) has been an established treatment for epilepsy since the 1970s, with a broad spectrum. It is frequently used as add on therapy for refractory patients. Furthermore, it is different from classic benzodiazepines (BZD) for containing nitrogen atoms in 1 and 5 positions of B ring (other are 1.4-BZD). This explains why CLB has a better tolerability and a lower chance of causing sedation, being an excellent option for epilepsy treatment compared with other BZDs. Evidence argues against the development of CLB tolerance in most patients. Antiseizure medication shortages have been reported by many countries, including the one studied here. Shortages make treatment harder, increase the need for extra clinical appointments, for orientation and medication changes, increase medication errors, decrease adherence, and cause insecurity. A literature review showed scarce evidence of alternatives, with a wide variation in dosage equivalence. A survey of specialists revealed that switch appropriateness was deemed inadequate by the majority, due to risk of seizure worsening and side effects. Clonazepam and nitrazepam were the most used BZDs, but there was great variation for clonazepam dosages (0.25-2 mg, commonly 1 per 10 mg of CLB). Better consensus was obtained for nitrazepam (5 per 10 mg of CLB). Gradual tapering of CLB, with concomitant increase of clonazepam or nitrazepam under close supervision, is advised. It is important to assess tolerability and the need for increased dosage. As CLB is an essential tool in the epilepsy armamentarium, shortages pose great risk to the patients. Governments and society must create mechanisms to prevent shortages of critical and unique medications.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsBenzodiazepinesClobazamEpilepsyHumansAnticonvulsantsBenzodiazepinesClobazam

Identifiers

PMID40921412
PMCPMC12417036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.