Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40921306›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2025

The Cost Effectiveness of a Free Summer Day Camp Voucher Program to Prevent Summer Weight Gain Among Children From Disadvantaged Households.

Brian K Chen, Michael W Beets, Sarah Burkart, Christopher D Pfledderer, Elizabeth Adams, R Glenn Weaver, Bridget Armstrong, Keith Brazendale, Xuanxuan Zhu, Alexander McLain

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating the Economic Impact of Learn-to-Swim Programmes: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the First Lap Voucher Programme in Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brian K ChenArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. Electronic address: bchen@mailbox.sc.edu.
Michael W BeetsArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Sarah BurkartArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Christopher D PfleddererUTHealth Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Elizabeth AdamsArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
R Glenn WeaverArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Bridget ArmstrongArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Keith BrazendaleDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Xuanxuan ZhuArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Alexander McLainArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

Funding

Reducing Health Disparities in Childhood Obesity Using Financial Incentives in Low-income HouseholdsR01DK120490 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BEETS, MICHAEL W · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK120490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSummer day camps can mitigate summer weight gain by providing a structured daily environment that promotes healthy behaviors, but summer day camps are often cost prohibitive to families with low income. This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of providing free summer day camps to disadvantaged children to prevent summer weight gain.

methodsA total of 422 children from a low-income school district in South Carolina were recruited and randomly assigned to receive 8-10 weeks of free summer day camps or to experience summer as usual in 2021-2023. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated by dividing summer day camp cost by the difference between the intervention and control groups in changes in BMI z-scores from the start to end of summer. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios at varied doses of summer day camp participation were also calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using nonparametric bootstrapping of trial-based BMI z-score outcomes, matched with summer day camp costs from across the country. The probability of cost effectiveness was assessed over a range of potential costs at which policymakers may be willing to support.

resultsThe summer day camp voucher program averted 0.0917 BMI z-score gain relative to the controls at a cost of $1,307, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,463 per 0.1 BMI z-score averted per child. Attending summer day camp 5 days per week, representing the highest dose, yielded the highest cost effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses showed that the bootstrapped incremental cost-effectiveness ratios averaged $2,187 per 0.1 BMI z-score averted, with 80% being <$3,500 per 0.1 BMI z-score averted.

conclusionsThe voucher program is likely cost effective, with 80% probability of cost effectiveness if policymakers are willing to pay $3,500 per 0.1 BMI z-score averted.

Indexed as

CampingHealth PromotionPediatric ObesityWeight GainBody Mass IndexChildCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMalePovertySeasonsSouth CarolinaVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID40921306
PMCPMC12766637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.