Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40921187›Full record

ArticleHomeopathy : the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy2026

Exploring the Homeopathic Therapeutic Potential of Acorus calamus: A Multi-center Open-Label Clinical Verification Study.

Suhana Panaparambil Azis, Charu Sehgal, Partha Sarathi Chakraborty, Prasanta Kumar Pradhan, Punam Kumari, Kaushal Kumar Savera, Amit Srivastava, Ratan Chandra Shil, Kumar Keshav Avinash, Sunil S Ramteke and 18 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Homeopathy : the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Suhana Panaparambil AzisDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6809-9364
Charu SehgalDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India.
Partha Sarathi ChakrabortyDepartment of Clinical Verification, Dr. Anjali Chatterjee Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Prasanta Kumar PradhanDepartment of Clinical Verification, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Puri, Odisha, India.
Punam KumariDepartment of Clinical Verification, Dr. D.P. Rastogi Central Research Institute of Homeopathy, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Kaushal Kumar SaveraDepartment of Clinical Verification, National Homeopathy Research Institute in Mental Health, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Amit SrivastavaDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Research Institute (Homeopathy), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ratan Chandra ShilDepartment of Clinical Verification, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Agartala, Tripura, India.
Kumar Keshav AvinashDepartment of Clinical Verification, Clinical Verification Unit (Homeopathy), Patna, Bihar, India.
Sunil S RamtekeDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India.
Amulya Ratna SahooDepartment of Clinical Verification, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Tejaswini Patole KambleDepartment of Clinical Verification, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Navi Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Uttam SinghDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Research Institute (Homeopathy), Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Mahesh SahDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Research Institute (Homeopathy), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ranjit SonnyDepartment of Clinical Verification, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Siliguri, West Bengal, India.
Liyi KarsoDepartment of Clinical Verification, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Vibha KumariDepartment of Clinical Verification, Clinical Verification Unit (Homeopathy), Patna, Bihar, India.
Divya VermaDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Research Institute (Homeopathy), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rakesh Kumar RanaStatistical Section, Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences Headquarters, Delhi, India.
Kusum LataDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India.
Beenu SainiDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India.
Satarupa SadhukhanDepartment of Clinical Verification, Dr. Anjali Chatterjee Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Renu VermaDepartment of Clinical Verification, Dr. D.P. Rastogi Central Research Institute of Homeopathy, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ann Maria RoseDepartment of Clinical Verification, National Homeopathy Research Institute in Mental Health, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Manila KumariDepartment of Clinical Verification, Clinical Verification Unit (Homeopathy), Patna, Bihar, India.
Meera SharmaDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Research Institute (Homeopathy), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Gauri SaxenaDepartment of Botany, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Subhash KaushikDepartment of Clinical Verification, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical verification in homeopathy is a systematic process that aims to validate the therapeutic efficacy of homeopathic medicines. The Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy (CCRH) has been conducting clinical verification studies in lesser known, fragmentarily proved and rare medicines such as Objective: The primary objective of the study was to assess the change in intensity of presenting symptoms of the participants after administration of the medicine Methods: A multi-center open-label study was conducted at the outpatient departments of the 14 hospitals/clinics of the CCRH located in different states of India. Participants having a minimum of three symptoms corresponding to the proving symptom of Results: Improvement in the symptomatology of 321 participants who completed a minimum of two follow-ups suggested the effectiveness of the medicine in treating various clinical conditions, including headache, constipation, respiratory diseases such as rhinitis, acute nasopharyngitis, sinusitis and cough, musculoskeletal disorders such as myalgia, arthralgia and cervical spondylosis, and skin conditions such as eczema. Conclusion: The study successfully verified the symptomatology of

Indexed as

HomeopathyMateria MedicaAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedMateria Medica

Identifiers

PMID40921187
PMCPMC13120845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.