Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40921169›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2025

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): 10-year clinical outcomes and post-hoc analysis by molecular classification from a randomised phase 3 trial.

Cathalijne C B Post, Stephanie M de Boer, Melanie E Powell, Linda Mileshkin, Dionyssios Katsaros, Paul Bessette, Alexandra Leary, Petronella B Ottevanger, Mary McCormack, Pearly Khaw and 19 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Cathalijne C B PostDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands. Electronic address: c.c.b.post@lumc.nl.
Stephanie M de BoerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Melanie E PowellDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Linda MileshkinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Dionyssios KatsarosDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Gynaecology, Città della Salute and S Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Paul BessetteDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Alexandra LearyDepartment of Cancer Medicine and Gynaecological Tumours Translational Research Lab, Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, INSERM U981, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Petronella B OttevangerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Mary McCormackDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University College Hospital London, London, UK.
Pearly KhawDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Romerai D'AmicoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale, Lecco, Italy.
Anthony FylesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cyrus ChargariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris, France.
Henry C KitchenerInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Viet DoLiverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrea LissoniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Diane ProvencherDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Catherine GenestieDepartment of Pathology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France.
Hans W NijmanDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Karen WhitmarshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Ina M Jürgenliemk-SchulzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Amanda FeeneyCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Ludy C H W LutgensMAASTRO Clinic Radiation Oncology, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Jeanette BoumaCentral Data Management and Trial Coordination, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Alicia Leon-CastilloDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Remi A NoutDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Tjalling BosseDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Carien L CreutzbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of chemoradiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We present the preplanned long-term analysis of the randomised PORTEC-3 trial with a post-hoc analysis including molecular classification of the tumours.

methodsPORTEC-3 was an open-label, multicentre, randomised, international phase 3 trial. Women were eligible if they had high-risk endometrial cancer (either International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage I, grade 3, with deep myometrial invasion and/or lymphovascular space invasion; stage II-III; or stage I-III with serous or clear-cell histology), were aged 18 years or older, and had a WHO performance score of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pelvic radiotherapy (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions) or chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy combined with two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m

findingsBetween Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 660 eligible and evaluable patients recruited at 103 centres in six clinical trial groups across seven countries were randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy (n=330) or radiotherapy alone (n=330). Median follow-up was 10·1 years (IQR 9·8-11·0). Estimated 10-year overall survival was 74·4% (95% CI 69·8-79·4) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 67·3% (62·3-72·7) in the radiotherapy group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·54-0·97], p=0·032), and 10-year recurrence-free survival was 72·8% (67·2-77·6) versus 67·4% (61·7-72·4; adjusted HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·56-0·98], p=0·034). Molecular analysis was available for 411 (62%) patients (210 [64%] of 330 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group and 201 [61%] of 330 patients in the radiotherapy group), whose characteristics were similar to the overall trial population. Post-hoc analysis by molecular class showed that, for women with p53 abnormal tumours, 10-year overall survival was 52·7% (95% CI 40·8-68·1) with chemoradiotherapy versus 36·6% (25·0 to 53·7) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted HR 0·52 [95% CI 0·30-0·91], p=0·021); 10-year recurrence-free survival was 52·6% (95% CI 38·3 to 65·0) versus 37·0% (95% CI 23·7 to 50·2; HR 0·42 [95% CI 0·24 to 0·74], p=0·0027). MMRd and POLEmut cancers did not seem to benefit from chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy alone, whereas the effects for NSMP cancers were modulated by oestrogen-receptor status.

interpretation10-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were improved for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone, with most clinically relevant benefit suggested for p53 abnormal cancers.

fundingDutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Cancer Australia, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantEndometrial NeoplasmsAdultAgedCarboplatinCisplatinFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPaclitaxelTreatment OutcomeCarboplatinCisplatinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID40921169
PMCPMC12479390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.