Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2025
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): 10-year clinical outcomes and post-hoc analysis by molecular classification from a randomised phase 3 trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adverse events in gynaecological radiotherapy: Better Reporting, Interpretation and Dissemination to Generate Evidence (BRIDGE).Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Adjuvant radiotherapy in FIGO stage III dMMR endometrial cancer: evidence and perspectives in the molecular era.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Preoperative CA125 and metabolic factors associated with high-risk pathology in endometrial cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Updates on molecular classification and treatment in endometrial cancer.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Molecular Profile of Advanced Endometrial Cancer (FIGO III-IV) in a Polish Multicentre Cohort: Clinicopathological Characterisation and Treatment Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of WHO 2020 Lymphovascular Space Invasion Categories in Endometrial Cancer: Substantial LVSI as an Independent Risk Factor and the Behavior of LVSI-Positive, Node-Negative Disease.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- Review
- Metabolism and Immunity-Adapted Radiotherapy (M.I.A.R): A Conceptual Framework for Overcoming the Therapeutic Plateau in Clinical Radiotherapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Prognostic Value of p53 Status in Endometrial Cancer: Real-World Evidence from a Tertiary Center.Cancers · 2026Article
- Cediranib with weekly paclitaxel or olaparib versus weekly paclitaxel for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (COPELIA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial in the UK.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Molecular Classification as a Predictor of Nodal Involvement and Survival Outcomes in Presumed Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Statement by the Uterus Commission of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie [German Gynecological Oncology Group] (AGO) on the ESGO-ESTRO-ESP Guideline 2025.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Review
- Natural Products in Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Preclinical Evidence, and Clinical Perspectives.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Prognostic Impact of POLE Exonuclease-Domain Mutations in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Prognostic Factors in the Treatment of Advanced Endometrial Cancer Patients: 12-Year Experience of an ESGO Certified Center.Cancers · 2026Article
- Interpreting p53 IHC-TP53 NGS discordance in endometrial cancer: a mechanism-based diagnostic framework and clinical implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Endometrial cancer molecular classification: research advances and clinical application.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of chemoradiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We present the preplanned long-term analysis of the randomised PORTEC-3 trial with a post-hoc analysis including molecular classification of the tumours.
methodsPORTEC-3 was an open-label, multicentre, randomised, international phase 3 trial. Women were eligible if they had high-risk endometrial cancer (either International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage I, grade 3, with deep myometrial invasion and/or lymphovascular space invasion; stage II-III; or stage I-III with serous or clear-cell histology), were aged 18 years or older, and had a WHO performance score of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pelvic radiotherapy (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions) or chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy combined with two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m
findingsBetween Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 660 eligible and evaluable patients recruited at 103 centres in six clinical trial groups across seven countries were randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy (n=330) or radiotherapy alone (n=330). Median follow-up was 10·1 years (IQR 9·8-11·0). Estimated 10-year overall survival was 74·4% (95% CI 69·8-79·4) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 67·3% (62·3-72·7) in the radiotherapy group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·54-0·97], p=0·032), and 10-year recurrence-free survival was 72·8% (67·2-77·6) versus 67·4% (61·7-72·4; adjusted HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·56-0·98], p=0·034). Molecular analysis was available for 411 (62%) patients (210 [64%] of 330 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group and 201 [61%] of 330 patients in the radiotherapy group), whose characteristics were similar to the overall trial population. Post-hoc analysis by molecular class showed that, for women with p53 abnormal tumours, 10-year overall survival was 52·7% (95% CI 40·8-68·1) with chemoradiotherapy versus 36·6% (25·0 to 53·7) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted HR 0·52 [95% CI 0·30-0·91], p=0·021); 10-year recurrence-free survival was 52·6% (95% CI 38·3 to 65·0) versus 37·0% (95% CI 23·7 to 50·2; HR 0·42 [95% CI 0·24 to 0·74], p=0·0027). MMRd and POLEmut cancers did not seem to benefit from chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy alone, whereas the effects for NSMP cancers were modulated by oestrogen-receptor status.
interpretation10-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were improved for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone, with most clinically relevant benefit suggested for p53 abnormal cancers.
fundingDutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Cancer Australia, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.