ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2026
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients with Congenital Uterine Anomalies: Evaluation of a Population Dataset.
Article in American journal of perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy Complications in Uterine Anomalies-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Birth Outcomes in Pregnancies with Uterine Malformations: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among patients with congenital uterine anomalies (CUA) using electronic health record data.Retrospective cohort study utilizing the TriNetX analytics research network, including female patients aged 10 to 55 with a documented singleton and intrauterine pregnancy.A total of 561,440 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 3,381 (0.6%) had one or more International Classification of Diseases (ICD) encounter diagnosis codes for CUA. Compared with patients with no documented ICD encounter diagnosis of CUA, patients with CUA had lower rates of live birth (odds ratio [OR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.38). CUA patients had higher rates of preterm labor (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.20-1.65), fetal malpresentation (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 2.16-2.85), and postpartum hemorrhage (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.31-1.80). Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) was increased in patients with CUA, including for hysterectomy (OR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.26-9.17) and acute renal failure (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.08-3.57).Patients with CUA are at higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with patients with normal uterine anatomy, including for SMM and postpartum complications. These patients should be counseled about these possible risks, and CUA should be incorporated into risk-stratification and prevention strategies. · Adversary pregnancy outcomes are higher with CUAs.. · CUA patients have higher risk of preterm delivery.. · CUAs are linked to higher rates of fetal malpresentation.. · Markers of SMM increased in patients with CUA.. · Enhanced screening and high-risk delivery care are encouraged..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.