ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Applications of Federated Large Language Model for Adverse Drug Reactions Prediction: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models for pneumonia detection in radiology reports via text analysis.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- LLM and CQL computable phenotypes for myocarditis adverse event feature and outcome determinations using patient FHIR data: a feasibility study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Active monitoring vs. spontaneous reporting of antineoplastic drug-related adverse drug reactions: evidence from the Chinese hospital pharmacovigilance system.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) present significant challenges in health care, where early prevention is vital for effective treatment and patient safety. Traditional supervised learning methods struggle to address heterogeneous health care data due to their unstructured nature, regulatory constraints, and restricted access to sensitive personal identifiable information. Objective: This review aims to explore the potential of federated learning (FL) combined with natural language processing and large language models (LLMs) to enhance ADR prediction. FL enables decentralized training across client clusters with limited resources, while LLMs effectively process unstructured health care data. By aggregating client-trained models into a global model, FL ensures broader data inclusion while maintaining privacy. Methods: A scoping review was conducted on peer-reviewed publications retrieved from Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar between 2019 and 2024. Results: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol, 145 articles from PubMed, arXiv, IEEE, and ACL Anthology met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 12 articles were selected for an in-depth review to examine use cases in ADR prediction. We synthesized ADR data sources on structured and unstructured data types, use cases of FL integrated with natural language processing, and open-source frameworks for ADR identifications and predictions. Special attention is given to unstructured ADR prediction using federated learning with large language models, including development and deployment strategies and evaluation metrics. Conclusions: Given the recent emergence of LLM, the integration of FL and LLM for ADR prediction remains in its early stage, with limited documented use cases. This review explored the potential applications and highlighted the advancements of federated learning with large language models in health care research, particularly in ADR prediction. Key focus areas include fine-tuning and merging algorithms, fairness and unbiasedness, implementation challenges, and real-world deployment strategies. By synthesizing current insights, this review aims to lay the groundwork for future research in privacy-preserving and scalable ADR prediction systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.