Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40921057›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2025

Quality indicator survey of clinical practice guidelines for esophagogastric junction cancer 2023.

Satoru Matsuda, Bas Wijnhoven, Florian Lordick, Pradeep Bhandari, Fenglin Liu, Ken Kato, Takuji Gotoda, Lorenzo Ferri, Hiroya Takeuchi, Yoshihiro Kakeji and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Satoru MatsudaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-2755
Bas WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-3697
Florian LordickDepartment of Oncology and University Cancer Center, Leipzig Leipzig University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central, Leipzig-Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-9339
Pradeep BhandariGastroenterology, Portsmouth University Hospital NHS Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Fenglin LiuSecond Department of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ken KatoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1733-5072
Takuji GotodaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Lorenzo FerriDivision of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Hiroya TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yoshihiro KakejiDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Han-Kwang YangNational Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3495-3048
Yuko KitagawaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines for esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJ GLs) were published in 2023. In order to evaluate how EGJ GLs have been adopted into clinical practice worldwide and to identify any outstanding clinical questions to be addressed in the next edition, this survey was conducted. An electronic questionnaire was developed. The questionnaire comprised 16 questions designed to assess the adoption of the guideline. Responses were collected online. The survey was conducted by the EGJ working group of International Gastric Cancer Association (IGCA) following approval from the guideline committee of The International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus (ISDE). As results, we received 344 valid and complete responses. 55% of respondents were from East Asia followed by Europe, Central/South America, and Central/West Asia. 80% of respondents recognized and followed the guidelines to some extent. There was still diversity in the extent of lymphadenectomy for EGJ cancers with an esophageal invasion of 2-4 cm. Although white light imaging (WLE) alone was recommended in the EGJ GLs, both WLE and image enhanced endoscopy were used in 86% of respondents. The perioperative treatment was shown to be highly diverse worldwide. While 50% of respondents provided perioperative chemotherapy, preoperative chemotherapy without adjuvant treatment and upfront surgery were still the first treatment option in 15% of respondents. In conclusion, the current survey conducted by IGCA and ISDE identified the current standard and remaining issues of EGJ cancers.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionGuideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicQuality Indicators, Health CareStomach NeoplasmsHealth Care SurveysHumansendoscopyesophagogastric junction cancerguidelinesmedical oncologysurgery

Identifiers

PMID40921057
PMCPMC12490043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.