ArticlePloS one2025
Rapid label-free identification of seven bacterial species using microfluidics, single-cell time-lapse phase-contrast microscopy, and deep learning-based image and video classification.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress History Establishes a Transient Tolerant State That Shapes Antibiotic Survival Upon Resuscitation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Foodborne Pathogen Detection from Sensing to Food Safety Systems: A Systematic Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Research advances in the application of microfluidic chip technology for rapid detection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Hybrid passive micromixer using combined traditional microfabrication and 3D printing for gold nanoparticle synthesis.PloS one · 2026Article
- MACNeXt-Based Bacteria Species Detection.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Label-free phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing on microfluidic platforms: a review of advances and translation.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Culture-free detection of bacteria from blood for rapid sepsis diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For effective treatment of bacterial infections, it is essential to identify the species causing the infection as early as possible. Current methods typically require hours of overnight culturing of a bacterial sample and a larger quantity of cells to function effectively. This study uses one-hour phase-contrast time-lapses of single-cell bacterial growth collected from microfluidic chip traps, also known as a "mother machine". These time-lapses are then used to train deep artificial neural networks (Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers) to identify the species. We have previously demonstrated this approach on four different species, which is now extended to seven common pathogens causing human infections: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus aureus. Furthermore, we expand upon our previous work by evaluating real-time performance as additional frames are captured during testing, and investigating the role of training set size, data quality, and data augmentation as well as the contribution of texture and morphology to performance. The experiments suggest that spatiotemporal features can be learned from video data of bacterial cell divisions, with both texture and morphology contributing to classifier decision. The method could be used simultaneously with phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) in the microfluidic chip. The best models attained an average precision of 93.5% and a recall of 94.7% (0.997 AUC) on a trap basis in a separate, unseen experiment with mixed species after around one hour. However, in a real-world scenario, one can assume many traps will contain the actual species causing the infection. Still, several challenges remain, such as isolating bacteria directly from blood and validating the method on diverse clinical isolates. This proof of principle study brings us closer to real-time diagnostics that could transform the initial treatment of acute infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.