Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40920893›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Rapid label-free identification of seven bacterial species using microfluidics, single-cell time-lapse phase-contrast microscopy, and deep learning-based image and video classification.

Erik Hallström, Vinodh Kandavalli, Carolina Wählby, Anders Hast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erik HallströmDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-3217
Vinodh KandavalliDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Carolina WählbyDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4139-7003
Anders HastDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For effective treatment of bacterial infections, it is essential to identify the species causing the infection as early as possible. Current methods typically require hours of overnight culturing of a bacterial sample and a larger quantity of cells to function effectively. This study uses one-hour phase-contrast time-lapses of single-cell bacterial growth collected from microfluidic chip traps, also known as a "mother machine". These time-lapses are then used to train deep artificial neural networks (Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers) to identify the species. We have previously demonstrated this approach on four different species, which is now extended to seven common pathogens causing human infections: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus aureus. Furthermore, we expand upon our previous work by evaluating real-time performance as additional frames are captured during testing, and investigating the role of training set size, data quality, and data augmentation as well as the contribution of texture and morphology to performance. The experiments suggest that spatiotemporal features can be learned from video data of bacterial cell divisions, with both texture and morphology contributing to classifier decision. The method could be used simultaneously with phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) in the microfluidic chip. The best models attained an average precision of 93.5% and a recall of 94.7% (0.997 AUC) on a trap basis in a separate, unseen experiment with mixed species after around one hour. However, in a real-world scenario, one can assume many traps will contain the actual species causing the infection. Still, several challenges remain, such as isolating bacteria directly from blood and validating the method on diverse clinical isolates. This proof of principle study brings us closer to real-time diagnostics that could transform the initial treatment of acute infections.

Indexed as

BacteriaDeep LearningMicrofluidicsEnterococcus faecalisEscherichia coliHumansMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastNeural Networks, ComputerPseudomonas aeruginosaSingle-Cell AnalysisStaphylococcus aureusTime-Lapse Imaging

Identifiers

PMID40920893
PMCPMC12416834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.