ArticlePloS one2025
SAMCell: Generalized label-free biological cell segmentation with segment anything.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maximum Matching Accuracy: An Instance Segmentation Evaluation Metric Utilizing Globally Optimal Matching.ArXiv · 2026Article
- A Review of Deep Learning Approaches Based on Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen analyzing cells in culture, assessing cell morphology (shape), confluency (density), and growth patterns are necessary for understanding cell health. These parameters are generally obtained by a skilled biologist inspecting light microscope images, but this can become very laborious for high-throughput applications. One way to speed up this process is by automating cell segmentation. Cell segmentation is the task of drawing a separate boundary around each cell in a microscope image. This task is made difficult by vague cell boundaries and the transparent nature of cells. Many techniques for automatic cell segmentation exist, but these methods often require annotated datasets, model retraining, and associated technical expertise.
resultsWe present SAMCell, a modified version of Meta's Segment Anything Model (SAM) trained on an existing large-scale dataset of microscopy images containing varying cell types and confluency. Our approach works on a wide range of microscopy images, including cell types not seen in training and on images taken by a different microscope. We also present a user-friendly UI that reduces the technical expertise needed for this automated microscopy technique.
conclusionsUsing SAMCell, biologists can quickly and automatically obtain cell segmentation results of higher quality than previous methods. Further, these results can be obtained through our custom Graphical User Interface, thus decreasing the human labor required in cell culturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.