Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40920883›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

SAMCell: Generalized label-free biological cell segmentation with segment anything.

Alexandra Dunnum VandeLoo, Nathan J Malta, Saahil Sanganeriya, Emilio Aponte, Caitlin van Zyl, Danfei Xu, Craig Forest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra Dunnum VandeLooSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0001-3035-3427
Nathan J MaltaSchool of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Saahil SanganeriyaSchool of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Emilio AponteSchool of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Caitlin van ZylDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Danfei XuSchool of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Craig ForestSchool of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen analyzing cells in culture, assessing cell morphology (shape), confluency (density), and growth patterns are necessary for understanding cell health. These parameters are generally obtained by a skilled biologist inspecting light microscope images, but this can become very laborious for high-throughput applications. One way to speed up this process is by automating cell segmentation. Cell segmentation is the task of drawing a separate boundary around each cell in a microscope image. This task is made difficult by vague cell boundaries and the transparent nature of cells. Many techniques for automatic cell segmentation exist, but these methods often require annotated datasets, model retraining, and associated technical expertise.

resultsWe present SAMCell, a modified version of Meta's Segment Anything Model (SAM) trained on an existing large-scale dataset of microscopy images containing varying cell types and confluency. Our approach works on a wide range of microscopy images, including cell types not seen in training and on images taken by a different microscope. We also present a user-friendly UI that reduces the technical expertise needed for this automated microscopy technique.

conclusionsUsing SAMCell, biologists can quickly and automatically obtain cell segmentation results of higher quality than previous methods. Further, these results can be obtained through our custom Graphical User Interface, thus decreasing the human labor required in cell culturing.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareAlgorithmsCell ShapeHumansMicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40920883
PMCPMC12416835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.