ArticlePloS one2025
Combining greedy and evolutionary algorithms to maximize influence in networks under deterministic linear threshold model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the paper we consider the well-known Influence Maximization (IM) and Target Set Selection (TSS) problems for Boolean networks under Deterministic Linear Threshold Model (DLTM). The main novelty of our paper is that we state these problems in the context of pseudo-Boolean optimization and solve them using evolutionary algorithms in combination with the known greedy heuristic. We also propose a new variant of (1 + 1)-Evolutionary Algorithm, which is designed to optimize a fitness function on the subset of the Boolean hypercube comprised of vectors of a fixed Hamming weight. The properties of this algorithm suit well for solving IM. The proposed algorithm is combined with the greedy heuristic for solving IM and TSS: the latter is used to construct initial solutions. We show that the described hybrid algorithms demonstrate significantly better performance compared to the computational scheme combining the greedy heuristic with the classic variant of (1 + 1)-EA. In the experiments, the proposed algorithms are applied to both real-world networks and the random networks constructed with respect to well-known models of random graphs. The results show that the new algorithms outperform the competition and are applicable to TSS and IM under DLTM for networks with tens of thousands of vertices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.