Observational studyPloS one2025
Trends in gestational age at birth in the city of São Paulo, Brazil between 2012 and 2019.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies have shown that excessive obstetric interventions such as induced labor and caesarean sections have contributed to the shortening of the length of gestation, leading to a left shift in gestational age (GA) at birth. The aim of this study was to analyze trends in GA and the contribution of associated factors to changes in São Paulo city, Brazil during the period 2012-2019. We conducted an observational time-series study of births in São Paulo using data from Brazil's national live births information system (SINASC). We calculated the annual percent change (APC) of births by GA between 2012 and 2019 and between the first and second four-year periods of the time series by applying log transformation to the percentages, followed by Prais-Winsten regression. A total of 1,525,759 live births were analyzed. From 2015, there was an increase in the proportion of live births between 39 and 40 weeks from 2015 and a fall in the proportion of early term (37-38 weeks) and preterm (< 37 weeks) births throughout the study period. The APC of births at 39 and 40 weeks was 7.9% and 5.7%, respectively, while the proportion of births at other gestational ages showed a statistically significant reduction over the study period. These reductions were more pronounced in the first four-year period (2012-2015). The same trend was observed when the data were analyzed by type of delivery, type of service (public or private), maternal age, and maternal education level. The findings show that there was a right shift in the GA curve during the study period and a reduction in the proportion of preterm and early term births. These changes were more pronounced in births that occurred in private hospitals. These changes reflect public policies implemented to reduce obstetric interventions such as induced labor and caesarean section before labor, especially before 39 weeks of gestation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.