ArticlePloS one2025
Refining the diagnostic approach to latent tuberculosis Infection with Quantiferon gold plus: A retrospective analysis of borderline results.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Quantiferon Gold Plus (QFT) test, a widely used interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), diagnoses latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) with a positivity threshold of ≥0.35 IU/mL. Results near this cut-off can be challenging to interpret due to variability from immunological, pre-analytical, and technical factors, prompting recommendations for a borderline range to refine diagnosis and reduce overtreatment. This retrospective study analyzed QFT results from 9,944 patients (2019-2023), establishing ranges: < 0.2 IU/mL as negative, 0.2-0.35 IU/mL as borderline negative, 0.35-0.7 IU/mL as borderline positive, and >0.7 IU/mL as positive. Borderline results occurred in 7.6% of patients, particularly in those born in Africa or South America, and in older individuals. Of 64 patients retested, 60.9% reverted to negative, while 17.1% of borderline negatives later converted to positive or borderline positive. Notably, no active TB cases emerged among those who reverted to negative on repeat testing. These findings emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of borderline QFT results, as their link to active TB progression differs from clear results. The study supports repeat testing of borderline cases to enhance LTBI diagnostic accuracy and inform treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.