ArticlePloS one2025
Superior health-related physical fitness and well-being in 12-15-year-old Danish adolescents who are active in organized leisure-time sports - a cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between physical activity and adolescent well-being: a loneliness-moderated chain mediation model with explainable machine learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity manifestation and formation mechanism of school youth sports activity quality: a multi-case comparative study based on the configurational perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal reports indicate that less than 20% of 11-17-year-olds meet physical activity recommendations, and while organized sports participation increases the likelihood of meeting these guidelines, no other studies were found that examined the impact on well-being and physical fitness outcomes among Danish adolescents based on participation in leisure time sports.
methodsThe study employed a cross-sectional design, assessing cardiorespiratory fitness, fat percentage, and well-being, as well as several other health and fitness outcomes among 1,333 Danish adolescents (50% girls). Differences between participants in organized sports and non-participants, as well as between participants in different sport categories were assessed through ANCOVA analysis.
resultsGirls and boys participating in organized sports, ran longer (p<0.05) in the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery level1 Children's test (IR1C) (G: d = 0.72 [0.54; 0.89]; B: d = 0.70 [0.50; 0.89]) and had lower (p<0.05) fat percentages than non-participants (G: d = 0.42 [0.25; 0.59]; B: d = 0.33 [0.14; 0.51]). Organized sport participants had higher (p < 0.05) well-being than non-participants in all KIDSCREEN-27 sub-scales apart from social support and peers. Girls in individual sports had lower (p<0.05) well-being than girls in other sports in all sub-scales apart from parent relations and autonomy. Multisport participation for both sexes, as well as participation in soccer for boys, was associated with a greater distance covered in the Yo-Yo IR1C (p < 0.05). A significant drop out of sports from the previous to the current year was found among girls, but not among boys.
conclusionParticipation in organized leisure-time sports is linked to better health, fitness, and well-being, especially for girls, who show greater disparities with non-participants. Participation in team sports is linked to higher well-being compared to individual sports in girls, but not in boys. High dropout rates among adolescent girls call for targeted strategies to sustain their participation and derived benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.