ArticlePloS one2025
Rapid response to hemorrhagic fever emergence in Guinea: community-based systems can enhance engagement and sustainability.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking Public Health Approaches to Crisis Response: Putting People First.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the 2013-2014 Ebola virus disease outbreak, Guinea has faced recurrent epidemics of viral hemorrhagic fevers. Although the country has learned from these epidemics by improving its disease surveillance and investigation capacities, local authorities and stakeholders, including community actors, are not sufficiently involved in the disease-emergence response. As a result, measures are not fully understood and have failed to engage local stakeholders. However, recent research has shown community-based response measures to be effective. For this study, we used a qualitative participatory research approach to (i) describe and analyze the health signals that alert local stakeholders to a problem, (ii) describe the outbreak response measures implemented in Guinée Forestière from local to national levels, and (iii) identify obstacles and levers for implementing responses adapted to the local sociocultural context. Local stakeholders receive a variety of health, environmental, and sociopolitical signals. When dealing with health signals, their next step should be to follow a flowchart developed using a top-down approach and disseminated by national stakeholders. However, our interviews revealed that local stakeholders found this official flowchart difficult to understand. To address this issue, we used a bottom-up approach to co-construct with local stakeholders a response flowchart based on their perceptions and experiences. The resulting diagram opens the door to the development of a community-based response. We then identified six main obstacle categories from the interviews, including insufficient logistical and financial resources, lack of legitimacy of community workers, and inadequate coordination. Based on these obstacles, we suggest ways to develop a response to emerging zoonotic diseases that would enable local stakeholders to better understand their roles and responsibilities and improve their commitment to the outbreak response. Ultimately, this study should help to build an integrated, community-based early warning and response system in Guinée Forestière.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.