ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Consent-driven, semi-automated data collection during birth and newborn resuscitation: Insights from the NewbornTime study.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate observations at birth and during newborn resuscitation are fundamental for quality improvement initiatives and research. However, manual data collection methods often lack consistency and objectivity, are not scalable, and may raise privacy concerns. The NewbornTime project aims to develop an AI system that generates accurate timelines from birth and newborn resuscitation events by automated video recording and processing, providing a source of objective and consistent data. This work aims to describe the implementation of the data collection system that is necessary to support the project's purpose. Videos were recorded using thermal sensors in labor rooms and thermal and visible light cameras in resuscitation rooms. Consent from mothers was obtained before birth, and healthcare providers were given the option to delete videos by opting out on a case-by-case basis. The video collection process was designed to minimize interference with ongoing treatment and not impose unnecessary burden on healthcare providers. At Stavanger University Hospital, 1012 thermal videos of birth and 274 visible light videos of newborn stabilization and resuscitation have been collected during the data collection period from November 2021 to June 2025. The utilization of automated data collection and AI video processing around birth may allow for consistent and enhanced documentation, quality improvement initiatives, and research opportunities on sequence, timing and duration of treatment activities during acute events, with less effort needed for capturing data and improved privacy for participants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.