ArticlePloS one2025
Biological findings from a newly developed photo-identification catalog for the critically endangered Rice's whale (Balaenoptera ricei).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Prey Availability for the Rice's Whale (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Rice's whale is among the world's most endangered whales. It has a small population size, low genetic diversity, and is exposed to several anthropogenic threats. In this study, we compiled photographs taken from whale sightings during vessel-based research surveys conducted by the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center between 2004 and 2019 and used photo-ID techniques to develop an identification catalog. Thirty-one whales were individually identified based on dorsal fin attributes and body marks. On the dorsal fin, lacerations, nicks and notches were the most commonly available attributes used for identification and matching. Cookiecutter shark bite scars were widely present on the body of the whales and also served for identification and matching. Of the 31 whales, 28 were sighted multiple times with time between sightings ranging from seven days to more than 15 years. Individual genotyping and sexing were available for 25 cataloged whales. Genotyping confirmed that whales identified via photographs were genetically unique and sexing resulted in 14 females and 11 males. Here we also present insights into rarely recorded presumed mother and calf pairs, with three female whales identified as presumed mothers. Finally, we document dorsal fin disfigurements, body deformities and confirm the identity of a whale mortality. Our study reveals the need for the long-term monitoring of Rice's whale individuals, especially presumed mothers and calves, and to further investigate potential human threats to this population using photo-identification techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.