Observational studyPain management2025
Epiduroscopy in spinal stenosis. Description of the procedure and safety measures to reduce complications.
Observational study in Pain management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03863067 (Assessment Of Clinical Effectiveness, Security And Correlation With Radiological Changes In Patients With Lumbar Stenosis Treated With Epiduroscopy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment Of Clinical Effectiveness, Security And Correlation With Radiological Changes In Patients With Lumbar Stenosis Treated With Epiduroscopy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this observational study is to describe the use of epiduroscopy to decrease the enlargement of the ligamentum flavum (LF) in patients with spinal stenosis, as well as the selection of the appropriate patient and the safety measures that enhance procedural success. MATERIALS &
methodsWe introduce the patient selection protocol, define the appropriate indication and the safety measures to use the epiduroscopy as a tool to decrease the size of the LF and increase space, reducing possible complications.
resultsAmong patients included in the study, there were no cases of access difficulty or coccydynia, and one case of urinary incontinence occurred in a patient with Schizas grade D (very severe) stenosis. In patients with grade C or lower stenosis, we have not found any case of sphincter incontinence.In four patients, we found paresthesias and in one patient a transient increase in pain. Dural puncture was performed in three patients, none developed headache.
conclusionsExclusion of patients with very severe canal stenosis according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria, the use of sacral hiatus measurements and the neurophysiological monitoring helps diminish the occurrence of neurological complications of epiduroscopy in patients with spinal stenosis. CLINICAL
trial registrationhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT03863067.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.