ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
The CONDUCT-AF trial: Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, multicentre study comparing conduction system and biventricular pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation for heart failure with atrial fibrillation.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac implantable electronic devices in heart failure: needs, challenges, and real-world implementation.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Improvement of functional mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in patients with atrial fibrillation after sinus rhythm restoration-the Berlin FMTR registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThere is a lack of data from randomized clinical trials comparing treatment outcomes between conduction system pacing (CSP) modalities and biventricular pacing (BVP) in symptomatic patients with refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA). The CONDUCT-AF investigates whether CSP is non-inferior to BVP in improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with symptomatic AF undergoing AVNA.
methodsThis study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial conducted across 10 European centres, enrolling 82 patients with symptomatic AF, HF with reduced LVEF, and narrow QRS. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to CSP or BVP with subsequent AVNA and followed for at least 24 months. The primary endpoint is the change in LVEF after 6 months. Secondary endpoints will include time to the first occurrence of worsening HF or cardiovascular death and its individual components, total number of HF hospitalizations, change in quality of life, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, 6-min walk test distance, and safety outcomes.
conclusionsThe CONDUCT-AF trial will provide critical insights into the optimal pacing modality for patients with HF and refractory AF undergoing AVNA. Recruitment is expected to conclude in 2025, with the first study results anticipated in 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.