Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40920292›Full record

SynthesisTargeted oncology2025

Published Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Imatinib Perform Poorly on TDM Data from Pediatric Patients.

Tianwu Yang, Anna Sofie Buhl Rasmussen, Allan Weimann, Maria Thastrup, Cecilie Utke Rank, Bodil Als-Nielsen, Johan Malmros, Hilde Skuterud Wik, Olli Lohi, Ulrik Overgaard and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Targeted oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tianwu YangDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0856-4497
Anna Sofie Buhl RasmussenDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-2914
Allan WeimannDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria ThastrupDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-5911
Cecilie Utke RankDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-3887
Bodil Als-NielsenDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Johan MalmrosChildhood Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7274-2957
Hilde Skuterud WikDepartment of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1035-5521
Olli LohiTamCAM Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-0797
Ulrik OvergaardDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Inga Maria Rinvoll JohannsdottirDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Goda VaitkevicieneCenter for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Clinics for Children Diseases, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-8164
Kim DalhoffDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5548-6381
Kjeld SchmiegelowDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0829-4993
Trine Meldgaard LundDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. trine.lund@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8598-2880

Funding

Børnecancerfonden 2021-7410Børnecancerfonden 2022-8178Director Michael Hermann Nielsen's Memorial Foundation 2022-0097724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation pharmacokinetic models can potentially provide suggestions for an initial dose and the magnitude of dose adjustment during therapeutic drug monitoring procedures of imatinib. Several population pharmacokinetic models for imatinib have been developed over the last two decades. However, their predictive performance is still unknown when extrapolated to different populations, especially children.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of these published models on an external real-world dataset containing data from both adults and children.

methodsA real-world dataset was collected, containing observations from adult and pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive/Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia (N = 39) treated with imatinib. A systematic review through PubMed was conducted to identify qualified population-pharmacokinetic models for external evaluation (i.e., prediction-based, simulation-based, and Bayesian forecasting diagnostics). Standard allometric scaling was used for models that were developed based on data from adults only.

resultsFifteen published models were found for evaluation, of which only two were based on data from both children and adults. Prediction-based diagnostics showed that some models had an acceptable level of bias. The model by Shriyan et al. (with allometric scaling) performed best with a median prediction error of 1.24%. However, no models performed well on precision even when allometric scaling was used, where the lowest median absolute prediction error was 37.66% using the model by Schmidli et al. The models by Golabchifar et al. and Schmidli et al. (both with allometric scaling) performed the best of all tested models, with a median prediction error ≤ 15%, median absolute prediction error ≤ 40%, fraction of prediction error within ± 20% (F

conclusionsCurrent models fail to accurately predict imatinib plasma concentrations in our real-world dataset, especially for children. Future pharmacokinetic studies should focus on developing better models for pediatric populations.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveModels, BiologicalPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib Mesylate

Identifiers

PMID40920292
PMCPMC12454585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.