ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2025
Validating the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-Short Version (RCADS-25) in Chinese Preadolescents.
Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diet quality in pediatric migraine and the educational quality of related short-form videos: a cross-sectional study and content analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Youth anxiety and depression are rising rapidly worldwide, highlighting the need for efficient school-based assessment tools across sociocultural contexts. The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) is one of the most widely used screening measures, with demonstrated cross-cultural applicability. However, its psychometric properties have rarely been evaluated in Chinese populations. This study assessed the psychometric properties of the 25-item short-version RCADS (RCADS-25) in a sample of 534 preadolescents in Mainland China (ages 9-12, 42% female). Participants completed self-reports on the RCADS-25, positive and negative affect, and psychological resilience, while their parents rated child internalizing and externalizing problems. The RCADS-25 showed adequate reliability and validity in our sample. RCADS-25 scores were positively associated with negative affect and emotional-behavioral difficulties, and negatively associated with positive affect and psychological resilience. Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that anxiety and depression are two distinct yet closely related constructs. In addition, participants at risk for clinical-level internalizing and externalizing problems had significantly higher RCADS-25 Total Depression scores. These findings provide initial psychometric support for using the RCADS-25 with Chinese preadolescents. Given its brevity, the RCADS-25 may be a valuable tool for large-scale mental health screening of Chinese students in school settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40920283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.