ReviewLa Radiologia medica2025
Metastatic breast involvement from extramammary malignancies: a review of dissemination pathways, imaging features, and management strategies.
Review in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metastases to the Male Breast: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic involvement (MB) of the breast from extramammary malignancies is rare, with an incidence of 0.09-1.3% of all breast malignancies. Due to its variable clinical and radiological presentation, MB often mimics primary breast cancer (BC), leading to potential misdiagnosis and impacting treatment decisions. This narrative review analysed MB cases based on dissemination pathways: hematogenous (HM), lymphatic (LM), or direct contiguous (DC) spread. HM was the most frequent, particularly in melanoma, lung, renal, and gastrointestinal carcinomas, presenting as well-circumscribed, non-calcified nodules without axillary lymph node involvement, distinguishing them from BC. LM spread, common in HM malignancies, caused diffuse breast oedema, skin thickening, and a "peau d'orange" appearance, resembling inflammatory BC. DC spread, though rarer, was observed in advanced lung cancer, with infiltrative lesions extending from the chest wall. Multimodal imaging (Mammography (DM), Ultrasound (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computer Tomography (CT), and Positron Emission Tomography (PET)) was critical for detecting MB, while histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed extramammary origin. Due to the rarity and heterogeneity of MB, diagnosis requires a multidisciplinary approach integrating oncological history, imaging, and pathology. Recognising distinct imaging patterns can aid early diagnosis, avoid unnecessary surgery, and guide appropriate systemic therapy based on the primary malignancy. Early identification of the metastatic pattern may influence clinical management decisions and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40920280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.