SynthesisJournal of intensive care medicine2026
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation by Intensivists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PurposeTo summarize the currently available evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannulation performed by intensivists.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of any design in which patients underwent ECMO cannulation by intensivists. The search was updated on Dec 15, 2024. Two independent authors screened titles and abstracts for general applicability, followed by full-text review to determine whether studies met the following criteria: (1) adult patients and (2) ECMO cannulation performed by intensivists. Two independent authors extracted study characteristics and outcomes of interest. The Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was used to stabilize variance. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled complication rates.ResultsA total of 209 studies were screened, and 12 retrospective, single-center studies were included. The pooled complication rate of ECMO cannulations performed by intensivists was 2% per cannula and 5% per patient. In the subgroup of VA ECMO cannulations, the complication rate was 9% per patient, whereas for VV ECMO cannulations, it was 4% per patient.ConclusionsECMO cannulation by intensivists appears to be safe and feasible when supported by adequate training, credentialing processes, and backup support from surgeons in the event of complications such as vascular injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.