ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Ultrasound Video-Based Radiomics Analysis for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Two-Dimensional Breast Ultrasound Radiomics: Implications for Lesion Characterization and Diagnostic Accuracy.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Radiomics analysis of biplanar ultrasound images can discriminate non-mass breast carcinoma from mastitis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Combined 2D-US and CDUS Nomogram for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of a combined model incorporating ultrasound video-based radiomics features and clinical variables for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.MethodsA total of 346 patients (173 benign and 173 malignant) were retrospectively enrolled. Breast ultrasound videos were acquired and processed using semi-automatic segmentation in 3D Slicer. Radiomics features were extracted from volumetric tumor regions and refined using feature selection methods. Models were constructed using clinical variables, radiomics features, and their combination. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC) values.ResultsThe clinical model incorporating age, tumor size, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification achieved an AUC of 0.873. The radiomics model, utilizing 14 selected features, attained an AUC of 0.836. The combined model, integrating radiomics and clinical data, demonstrated significantly improved predictive performance with an AUC of 0.926, surpassing the BI-RADS-based model (AUC = 0.737). Internal validation using bootstrap resampling confirmed the robustness of the combined model (AUC = 0.901-0.954).ConclusionThe integration of ultrasound video-based radiomics with clinical characteristics significantly improves the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors compared to conventional BI-RADS evaluation. This approach may enhance diagnostic accuracy and facilitate more precise clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.