Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40920063›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Trends in cervical cancer incidence in the Netherlands: A join-point and age-period-cohort analysis (1989-2023).

Kelly Melisa Castañeda, Karin Marianne Vermeulen, Maaike van der Aa, Ed Schuuring, G Bea A Wisman, Geertruida Hendrika de Bock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelly Melisa CastañedaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4520-1706
Karin Marianne VermeulenDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maaike van der AaNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ed SchuuringDepartment of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
G Bea A WismanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4830-3401
Geertruida Hendrika de BockDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MinCiencias), Colombia.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a significant public health issue, ranking as the fourth most common cancer in women globally. In the Netherlands, cervical cancer incidence declined steadily from 1989 to 2001 but increased between 2001 and 2007. This study updates trends in cervical cancer incidence from 1989 to 2023 in the Netherlands and evaluates the impact of screening practices and participation rates in the national population-based screening program. This ecological study uses group-level data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (1989-2023) to analyze trends across three temporal dimensions-age, period, and cohort-using age-period-cohort analysis and join-point regression to identify significant changes in trends over time. Cervical cancer incidence declined steadily from 1989 to 2003 but increased from 2003 to 2023, particularly among younger birth cohorts (1976-1995). This increase aligns with the decline in screening participation, which dropped from over 77% before 2003 to below 60% in subsequent years, as well as the introduction of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing in 2017, which has higher sensitivity than cytology, leading to more cases being detected and, consequently, an increase in incidence. Trends in cervical cancer incidence in the Netherlands indicate a positive impact of the screening program, with a steady decline over the years. However, efforts should focus on increasing participation in both screening and vaccination, as this is crucial for achieving the goal of reducing incidence to below 4 per 100,000 women, in line with the global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedAge FactorsCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNetherlandsRegistriesYoung Adultearly detection of cancergroup‐level datahuman papillomavirus virusesincidencetrendsuterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40920063
PMCPMC12588549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.