ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
TMBquant: an explainable AI-powered caller advancing tumor mutation burden quantification across heterogeneous samples.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection for germline and somatic analysis with long-read sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate tumor mutation burden (TMB) quantification is critical for immunotherapy stratification, yet remains challenging due to variability across sequencing platforms, tumor heterogeneity, and variant calling pipelines. Here, we introduce TMBquant, an explainable AI-powered caller designed to optimize TMB estimation through dynamic feature selection, ensemble learning, and automated strategy adaptation. Built upon the H2O AutoML framework, TMBquant integrates variant features, minimizes classification errors, and enhances both accuracy and stability across diverse datasets. We benchmarked TMBquant against nine widely used variant callers, including traditional tools (e.g. Mutect2, VarScan2, Strelka2) and recent AI-based methods (DeepSomatic, Octopus), using 706 whole-exome sequencing tumor-control pairs. To evaluate clinical relevance, we further assessed TMBquant through survival analyses across immunotherapy-treated cohorts of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and the two NSCLC subtypes: lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma. In each cohort, TMBquant consistently achieved the highest hazard ratios, demonstrating superior patient stratification compared to all other methods. Importantly, TMBquant maintained robust predictive performance across both high-TMB (NSCLC) and low-TMB (NPC) settings, highlighting its generalizability across cancer types with distinct biological characteristics. These findings establish TMBquant as a reliable, reproducible, and clinically actionable tool for precision oncology. The software is open source and freely available at https://github.com/SomaticCaller/SomaticCaller. To enhance reproducibility, we provide detailed usage instructions and representative code snippets for TMBquant in the Methods section (see Code Availability).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.