Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919886›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2025

Evaluation of Hydrophobic, Hydrophilic, and Water Adsorption Properties of Microporous Metal-Organic Framework Materials by Unified Isotherm Analysis.

Steven W Rutherford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven W RutherfordDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-3714-4422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global challenges posed by freshwater scarcity and the water-energy nexus drive demand for novel macromolecular design of tailored nanostructures endowed with a variety of hydrophilic and hydrophobic features. Offering potential to meet this demand, metal-organic framework (MOF) materials are synthesized from coordinated formations that create versatile reticular structures with variable water adsorption affinities. However, advances in the fundamental understanding of water interactions within these structures are impeded by the failure of classical analyses to identify mechanisms of interaction, connect fundamental isotherm types, and provide appropriate benchmarks for assessment. Proposed herein is a novel definition of hydrophobicity that is coherently coupled with a unified isotherm analysis to connect a wide array of rigorous equilibrium isotherm types bounded by asymptotic limits dictated by hydrophilic rectangular Type I and hydrophobic stepwise Type V (unimodal Type VI). Moreover, distinct forms of hydrophobicity, associated benchmarks and discrete classes of material behavior are introduced to characterize hydrophobic to hydrophilic transitions. Simplification of the analysis for application to microporous MOF materials displaying nominally stepwise water adsorption isotherms yields Ising-Model-Modified-Kelvin-Analysis (IMMKA) that is delivered in a simple, rigorous, analytic form. Mechanisms of pore filling are characterized, allowing verification of widely accepted protocols and "rules of thumb" for the prediction of micropore filling pressures. The analysis successfully captures the foundational features of water in extreme confinement, including the role of pore morphology in directing the molecular and fluidic interactions that underpin the pseudocondensation mechanism of water in micropores.

Identifiers

PMID40919886
PMCPMC12461938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.