Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919661›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025

Comparative efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication versus standard sleeve gastrectomy in obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomised trial.

Pierdiwasi Maimaitiyusupu, Aikebaier Aili, Maimaiti Yisireyili, Yiliang Li, Kelimu Abudureyimu, Xin Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Weight loss outcomes after Nissen sleeve gastrectomy vs standard sleeve gastrectomy in female patients: a retrospective matched -cohort study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pierdiwasi MaimaitiyusupuDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.ORCID 0009-0006-6023-4943
Aikebaier AiliDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Maimaiti YisireyiliDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Yiliang LiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Kelimu AbudureyimuDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Xin LiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.ORCID 0009-0008-7842-8070

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82060166Special Project for Key R&D Tasks of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2023B03010Tianchi Hundred People Project for Introducing High-level Talents in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region 201939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis randomised controlled trial compared the efficacy of modified laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication (LSGFD) versus standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in achieving weight loss and alleviating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with obesity. MATERIALS AND

methodsEighty patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥27.5 kg/m

resultsNo significant differences were observed between the two groups in preoperative parameters. However, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant reductions in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference and waist-hip ratio, along with a significant increase in the %EWL. The LSGFD group demonstrated superior outcomes in treating GERD and other obesity-related comorbidities, particularly notable improvements in reflux esophagitis.

conclusionsLSGFD provides equivalent weight loss to LSG but significantly superior control of GERD symptoms and resolution of reflux esophagitis. It offers enhanced management of obesity-related comorbidities without increasing surgical risk, supporting its use in obese patients with GERD.

Indexed as

FundoplicationGastrectomyGastroesophageal RefluxLaparoscopyObesityObesity, MorbidAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeWeight Lossbariatric surgeryfundoplicationgastroesophageal reflux diseaseobesityrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40919661
PMCPMC12587246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.