ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Coalescent theory of the ψ directionality index.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ψ directionality index was introduced by Peter and Slatkin (Evolution 67: 3274-3289, 2013) to infer the direction of range expansions from single-nucleotide polymorphism variation. Computed from the joint site frequency spectrum for two populations, ψ uses shared genetic variants to measure the difference in the amount of genetic drift experienced by the populations, associating excess drift with greater distance from the origin of the range expansion. Although ψ has been successfully applied in natural populations, its statistical properties have not been well understood. In this article, we define Ψ as a random variable originating from a coalescent process in a two-population demography. For samples consisting of a pair of diploid genomes, one from each of two populations, we derive expressions for moments E[Ψk] for standard parameterizations of bottlenecks during a founder event. For the expectation E[Ψ], we identify parameter combinations that represent distinct demographic scenarios yet yield the same value of E[Ψ]. We also show that the variance V[Ψ] increases with the time since the bottleneck and bottleneck severity, but does not depend on the size of the ancestral population; the ancestral population size affects ψ computed from many biallelic loci only through its contribution to the total number of loci available for the computation. Finally, we analyze the values of E[Ψ] computed from existing demographic models of Drosophila melanogaster and compare them with empirically computed ψ. Our work builds the foundation for theoretical treatments of the ψ index and can help in evaluating its behavior in empirical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.