ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025
The Relative Effectiveness of Physical Therapy and Pain Medication in Managing Sports-related Injuries.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sports-related musculoskeletal injuries are common and represent a significant public health concern, especially among physically active individuals. These injuries are typically managed through pharmacological methods such as pain medication or through rehabilitative approaches like physical therapy (PT). While both modalities are widely used, their comparative effectiveness in promoting long-term recovery, particularly from the perspective of those injured, remains a critical area for research. # Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate the relative effectiveness of PT and pain medication in managing sports-related injuries. Specifically, it explores pain relief outcomes, long-term recovery perceptions, and treatment preferences among individuals with prior sports injuries, using a patient-reported survey approach. # Methods This cross-sectional survey-based study involved 200 participants who had experienced a sports-related injury. Inclusion criteria for the study included being at least 18 years of age, having sustained an injury related to physical activity, and having undergone treatment involving either pain medication, physical therapy (PT), or a combination of both. Participants provided information on injury types, pain intensity immediately following the injury (measured on a 5-point Likert scale), treatment approaches, treatment duration, and their perceptions of long-term effectiveness. Data analysis was performed using JMP Pro 15. # Results The participant population, totaling 200 individuals, consisted of 99 males (49.5%) and 101 females (50.5%), with a median age of 36.5 years (range 18-88). The most frequently reported injuries were sprains (33%) and muscle strains (20%). Regarding treatment, 50% of participants used a combination of pain medication and PT, 38% relied solely on pain medication, and 12% underwent only PT. A majority (59%) rated their initial pain as severe (≥4/5). Among those treated with pain medication, 65% experienced pain recurrence once the medication's effects subsided. In contrast, 73% of PT users agreed or strongly agreed that PT provided long-term injury resolution. Additionally, 68.2% of participants who utilized both treatments indicated that PT was more effective for sustained recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.