ArticleJournal of CME2025
Exploring the Integration of Patient Perspectives in Surgeon Education: Awareness, Engagement and Barriers to Implementation.
Article in Journal of CME, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating patient perspectives in medical education is increasingly recognised as critical for patient-centred care. However, many continuing professional development (CPD) programmes - particularly in surgical education - lack a structured approach to involve the patient perspective. This study explored faculty awareness, exposure, engagement and perceived barriers to integrating patient perspectives in surgeon education. We conducted an initial interview with a surgeon educator and a patient advocate to promote awareness and inform the design of an online questionnaire to be distributed to surgeon faculty. The questionnaire assessed familiarity with patient inclusion in education, frequency of involvement in educational activities, collaboration with patient organisations and perceived importance and barriers. We received 68 responses from surgeon faculty across 32 countries. While 77.7% were familiar with the concept of patient inclusion, only 54.4% had attended education that included patient perspectives in the past 5 years and 44.1% had involved patients in designing or delivering education. The most cited barriers for patient inclusion were lack of awareness (64.7%), institutional culture (45.6%), time constraints (42.7%), and concerns about liability or ethics (36.8%). Despite perception of low current levels of integration by 85.3% of respondents, the overall importance of incorporating the patient perspective in surgical education was rated high (average 3.57/5). Suggestions for improvement included partnerships with advocacy groups, use of patient stories, and involving patients in curriculum development. We can conclude that faculty recognise the value of integrating patient perspectives in surgical education, but practical implementation in CPD remains limited. Addressing cultural, ethical and institutional barriers and promoting collaboration with patient organisations may support more meaningful and sustained integration of patient perspectives in surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.