ArticleTranslational animal science2025
Hybrid rye grain inclusion strategies as a replacement for corn grain in finishing cattle diets: effects on growth performance and carcass characteristics.
Article in Translational animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating processing methods of hybrid rye fed to growing beef steers.Translational animal science · 2026Article
- Effect of processing method of hybrid rye grain on growth performance, dietary net energy utilization, and carcass characteristics of yearling beef steers fed a finishing diet.Translational animal science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding dry-rolled hybrid rye grain (DRRG) as a replacement for dry-rolled corn (DRC) in beef cattle finishing diets. Two inclusion strategies for rye grain (RG) were evaluated: a total replacement of DRC for a limited time and a partial replacement during the entire feeding trial for Exp. 1 and 2, respectively. In Exp. 1, primarily Angus steers [n = 110, initial shrunk body weight (BW) 391 ± 31.5 kg] were blocked by BW and pen location in 7 blocks and assigned to either 1-A) DRC as the sole grain during the entire finishing (DRC), or 1-B) DRRG during the initial 46 d (replacement phase) and then switched to DRC (DRRG/DRC). In Exp. 2, primarily Angus steers (n = 44, initial shrunk BW 436 ± 41.0 kg) were blocked by BW and pen location in 4 blocks and assigned to either 2-A) DRC as the sole grain (DRC), or 2-B) the dietary grain component was a blend of one-third DRRG and two-thirds DRC (DM basis), during the entire feeding trial (MIX). Steers were fed for a total of 144 and 119 d in Exp. 1 and Exp. 2, respectively. Pen was the experimental unit, and data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design for both experiments. In Exp. 1, DRRG-fed steers had 18% less dry matter intake (DMI;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.