ArticlePalliative medicine reports2025
A National Quality Initiative to Improve Palliative Care Outcomes: Identifying Enabling Factors that Drive Quality Improvement.
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Defining palliative care service capability: a scoping review to support quality improvement and benchmarking.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC), established in 2005 and funded by the Australian Government, is a national quality improvement initiative that integrates patient outcome measures into routine clinical practice. While PCOC supports services to improve patient care, implementation across diverse clinical settings presents challenges, with variation observed between similarly resourced services. Engaging services in continuous quality improvement proves difficult as the program grows. Objectives: To identify factors associated with high-performing palliative care services and develop and evaluate an implementation framework and education program that supports continuous quality improvement. Methods: Patient outcome data and case studies from established PCOC-participating services were analyzed to identify high-performing services and the factors enabling successful integration of outcome measures. Based on the findings, an implementation framework was developed. Improvement trends were assessed in 20 services participating pre-intervention (2016-2018) and 11 services participating post-intervention (2022-2024). Results: Five key strategies and 25 enabling factors for successful integration were identified including, leadership and governance; education to improve data literacy; infrastructure for the meaningful management of data; and uptake of PCOC in quality systems. The post-intervention services started with higher benchmark performance and showed improvements within 6 months of implementation. Addressing patient's psychological/spiritual needs continues to be challenging. Conclusion: Quality improvement involving outcome measurement and benchmarking in palliative care requires education and structured implementation with ongoing feedback. The PCOC initiative demonstrates that improving patient outcomes involves more than collecting and analyzing outcome measures and benchmarking-it requires integrated assessment models, education, and resources to support information-driven quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.