Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919553›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine reports2025

A Strategic Path Forward for Hospice and Palliative Care: A White Paper on the Potential Future of the Field.

Ira Byock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Palliative medicine reports · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ira ByockDartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Missoula, Montana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of hospice and palliative care in the United States is experiencing serious problems and faces an uncertain future. Quality of hospice care is highly variable. Unethical hospice business practices are common in some regions. Palliative care's integration within American health care has stalled, despite demonstrating that much better care for seriously ill and dying people is both feasible and affordable. Corrective steps have been halting. Urgent work is needed to safeguard seriously ill patients and their families and ensure quality and reliability of hospice and palliative care programs and services. The moment has come for the clinical specialties and corporate community of hospice and palliative care to chart a strategic path forward. Efforts must start with zero tolerance of fraudulent business and clinical practices that harm vulnerable patients. The four components of this strategic approach are (1) publishing clear clinical and programmatic standards, (2) making meaningful data readily available, (3) driving quality-based competition, and (4) embracing the field's authentic brand of expert care that fosters well-being for patients and their families. Part I of this white paper examines the root causes of the key problems facing the field. Part II presents the rationale and practical considerations for each of the four components of this strategy. This path forward addresses the hard problems the field faces and enables it to realize its dual mission of caring well for ill and dying people and helping society integrate illness, caregiving, dying, and grieving within a continuum of full and healthy living.

Indexed as

clinical standardscompetition in health carehospice staffingprogram integrityprogram standardsquality measures

Identifiers

PMID40919553
PMCPMC12410326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.