ArticlePalliative medicine reports2025
Facilitated Versus Self-Directed Educational Modalities in Palliative Care Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the CAPACITI Intervention.
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05120154 (Improving Palliative Care in the Home and Community), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Palliative Care in the Home and Community: Building CAPACITI (Community Access to Palliative Care Via Interprofessional Primary Care Teams Improvement) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary Care Providers' Perceptions of the CAPACITI Palliative Care Education Trial: A Qualitative Study of Experiences With Self-Directed and Facilitated Modalities.Journal of palliative care · 2026Trial
- How should we evaluate the impact and implementation of palliative care education programs? The Pallium Canada experience.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Community Access to Palliative Care via Interprofessional Teams Improvement (CAPACITI) is a virtual educational program designed to support primary care providers in delivering a palliative approach to care. This study evaluated whether expert-facilitated sessions result in greater self-rated competency than a self-directed format across three CAPACITI modules: Identification and Assessment, Communication, and Ongoing Management. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial where 566 interprofessional primary care team members were randomized to facilitated or self-directed delivery of the CAPACITI program. Participants completed two validated surveys at baseline and after each module: the End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey and the CAPACITI Competencies survey. These assessed self-rated comfort and competency in providing palliative care. Results: Of the 566 participants randomized, 378 completed Module 1, and 270 and 192 completed Modules 2 and 3, respectively. Participants in both study arms demonstrated significant improvements in self-assessed comfort and competency following each module. No significant differences were observed between the facilitated and self-directed groups across either survey instrument. Conclusion: Participants in both the facilitated and self-directed study arms reported significant increases in self-rated comfort and competency in providing a palliative approach to care. CAPACITI demonstrates that a relatively large, intensive, and feasible training program can be implemented virtually across diverse care settings. These results support the broader application of structured, scalable educational interventions in primary care, particularly those grounded in practical content and adult learning principles. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05120154. Date registered: Oct 15, 2021. The authors affirm that this trial was registered prior to enrolling any participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.