ArticlePalliative medicine reports2025
Educational Intervention "Open Conversation and Reflection" to Enhance Person-Centeredness in Acute Geriatric Wards: A Qualitative Study of Consequences and Processes.
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Person-centered supportive care for older persons with acute illness is much needed but not easily achieved. Aims of the Study: To uncover processes and consequences of an educational intervention in acute geriatric wards intended as an exposure experience. Design: General inductive qualitative analysis was conducted on data from a four-step intervention: group coaching, an open conversation with a patient and family member (PT/FM), reflection on transcribed conversations with co-participant, and group peer reflection. Methods: Twelve participants engaged in the intervention. Transcripts from paired reflection sessions and peer reflections were analyzed using general inductive qualitative analysis. Results: The exposure experience of the participants involved three major processes: (1) fear before the conversation, (2) presence during the conversation, and (3) responsiveness after the conversation. Each process entailed several substeps. Not only the open conversation but also the whole process of reflection with a co-participant after reading the transcript and the peer-reflection sessions seem to be needed to realize the exposure experience. Conclusions: Through the educational intervention "open conversation and reflection," participants experienced that connecting with PT/FM and listening to what is important to them are essential to realize person-centered care. Thus, pending further studies, the educational intervention can be considered promising to enhance person-centeredness in older people's care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.