ReviewIntegrative medicine research2026
Effectiveness of herbal medicine as an add-on to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders accompanied by depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Integrative medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Herbal Medicine Compared to Antidepressants in Patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Accompanied by Depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of pharmacopuncture · 2026Review
- Article
- Genistein Reduces the Risk of Diabetes in Long-Term Hospitalized Schizophrenic Patients.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression is a common comorbidity of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSDs) that affects functional outcomes and quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of herbal medicine as an adjunct therapy to antipsychotics in patients with SSDs and comorbid depression. Methods: Eight databases were searched from inception to January 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating herbal medicine combined with antipsychotics vs antipsychotics alone in patients with SSDs and comorbid depression. The primary outcome measure was a depression-specific assessment instrument. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE. Results: Overall, of 12 RCTs, 884 participants were included. Compared to antipsychotics, combination therapy significantly improved depressive symptoms (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.91, 95 % confidence interval (CI) -1.05 to -0.76, p<0.00001, N=10, n=768, moderate certainty), enhanced efficacy for schizophrenia symptoms (SMD -0.60, 95 % CI -0.89 to -0.31, p=0.0014, N=9, n=666, moderate certainty), and showed higher response rates (relative risk [RR] 1.26, 95 % CI 1.04 to 1.52, p=0.0277, N=5, n=372, low certainty). Adverse event rates showed no significant difference between groups (RR 1.18, 95 % CI 0.69 to 2.01, p=0.1609, N=2, n=136, low certainty). Conclusions: This review provides evidence that herbal medicine, as an adjunct to antipsychotics, may improve both depressive and psychotic symptoms in patients with SSDs and comorbid depression. Although promising, methodological limitations and the exclusive Chinese origin of the studies indicate the need for more rigorous and diverse trials to establish definitive clinical recommendations. Protocol registration: PROSPERO, CRD42025643148.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.