ArticleGlobal journal on quality and safety in healthcare2025
Nurses' Views and Attitudes of the Performance Appraisal System Efficacy and Its Impact on Their Work Outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital.
Article in Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nurse Performance Evaluation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Measurement Approaches, Determinants, Appraisal Processes, and Outcomes.Journal of nursing management · 2026Pooled it
- Building on Self-Determination Theory to Unravel the Motivational Drivers of Nurses and Rehabilitation Therapists in a Moroccan University Hospital: A Qualitative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Predictors of Organisational Commitment and Retention Intent Among Midcareer Nurses: Addressing the Midcareer Dip in Taiwan.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- "They Care a Lot": A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Perspective on the Performance Appraisal Process in Israel.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Performance appraisal (PA) is essential for healthcare organizations. Highlighting the impact of the nursing PA system on nurses' work outcomes has the potential to significantly improve the quality of patient care. Understanding and enhancing the performance appraisal system is key to achieving this goal. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the nursing PA system and its effect on nurses' work outcomes. It also compared the perceptions of PA among staff nurses (SNs), charge nurses (CNs), and head nurses (HNs), providing valuable insights into the dynamics of the nursing PA system. Method: A cross-sectional, descriptive, and comparative design was adopted to assess the current nursing PA system. Results: This study, which included 356 nurses, revealed significant differences in the perception of PA among nurses at all levels. The findings underscore the practical implications of the potential for more efficient use of PA to improve nurses' performance. SNs and CNs showed significant gender-based differences in PA effectiveness ( Conclusion: This study's findings underscore the significant impact of inappropriate PA systems, inefficient instruments, and unskilled evaluators on organizational commitment, job satisfaction, maintaining a committed nursing workforce, and high-quality healthcare. The study also highlights the importance of effective performance appraisal systems in healthcare organizations. However, the study also emphasizes the crucial role of a mutual understanding between the appraiser and the appraisee. This understanding is a key factor in enhancing the efficacy of PA, thereby emphasizing its importance in the appraisal process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.