ArticleFuture healthcare journal2025
Utilising the General Medical Council survey as an incentive to improve training satisfaction in cardiology: A case study.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training experience across UK medicine: deanery differences versus site variation-General Medical Council National Training Survey 2025 analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The all-encompassing vision ofFuture healthcare journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The General Medical Council (GMC) National training survey is a powerful tool that allows us to understand the quality of training based on feedback from resident doctors. The results of the 2022 study indicated that the training satisfaction in our cardiology department was below the national average in United Kingdom. We used local surveys and feedback meetings to better understands the nuances of our training environment and we successfully implemented change using the Kotter's 8-step change model to improve training satisfaction. The GMC survey results in 2024 showed that our changes resulted in a significant increase in the categories of overall satisfaction (82.22 from 48.33, p < 0.0001), local teaching (77.14 from 23.67, p < 0.0001) and rota design (62.5 from 19.79, p < 0.0001).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.