Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919460›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2025

Events in the stream of behavior.

Maverick E Smith, Jeffrey M Zacks, Zachariah M Reagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maverick E SmithWashington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0003-0345-2371
Jeffrey M ZacksWashington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-3690
Zachariah M ReaghWashington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0002-4763-4268

Funding

AGING AND DEVELOPMENTT32AG000030 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENISE HEAD, Jeffrey M Zacks · 1985 to 2026
$9.7M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human mind constructs and updates models of events during comprehension. Event models are multidimensional, multi-timescale, and structured. They enable prediction, shape memory formation, and facilitate action control. Event models may be updated incrementally by replacing feature information as it changes or globally by constructing an entirely new model; there is evidence for both mechanisms. Default mode network components, particularly medial prefrontal cortex, are thought to implement key event model functions, utilizing a temporally graded architecture in which regions with longer timescales perform more integration and abstraction. Two signatures of event model representations are phasic changes in overall activity at event boundaries and shifts in neural patterns at those boundaries. Current theories propose multiple control structures for event model updating, including monitoring the quality of event model-driven predictions. Event model updating during comprehension has important consequences not only for processing information in the moment, but also for forming long-term memories.

Indexed as

default mode networkevent modelmedial prefrontal cortexprediction errorschemauncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40919460
PMCPMC12410856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.