Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919438›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025

Advancing outcome measure development and analytical approaches: Pain in Animals Workshop 2023.

B D X Lascelles, D Barratt, P S Basran, D C Brown, J F Coetzee, M Gill, M R Hutchinson, C Johnson, S P L Luna, D P Mohapatra and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

B D X LascellesTranslational Research in Pain and Comparative Pain Research and Education Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
D BarrattSchool of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
P S BasranCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
D C BrownMedical Affairs, Mars Veterinary Health, Vancouver, WA, United States.
J F CoetzeeDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
M GillNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
M R HutchinsonSchool of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
C JohnsonCenter for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, United States.
S P L LunaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
D P MohapatraNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
M L OshinskyNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
S RobertsonLap of Love Veterinary Hospice, Lutz, FL, United States.
C F RubermanCenter for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, United States.
E R SmithCenter for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, United States.
Q ZhangCenter for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annually, millions of humans and animals suffer from chronic and acute pain, creating welfare and quality of life concerns for both humans and animals who suffer this pain. In developing new therapeutic approaches, the challenge is to accurately measure this pain to ascertain the efficacy of novel therapeutics. Additionally, there is a need to develop new and effective analgesic options that may offer alternatives to using opioids that contribute to the opioid epidemic. The Pain in Animals Workshop (PAW) meetings are held every other year in partnership with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), bringing key stakeholders together to understand pain in humans and animals better. The 2023 workshop focused on presenting and discussing updates on validated approaches to measuring pain, highlighting opportunity areas for additional outcome measure development. It also discussed study design and analytic approaches to the use of outcome measures in clinical trials, including the important concepts of success-failure approaches and the application of multiple endpoints in evaluating analgesic therapies. The workshop also introduced the concept of the biopsychosocial model of pain, broadening the conversation around the impact of pain and thus opportunities to modulate the pain experience. The application of artificial intelligence to the measurement of pain was introduced. The workshop brought together academia, government, and industry experts in human and animal pain assessment and analgesic intervention development. Given the topic's importance and the meeting's uniqueness, capturing the thoughts and ideas presented and discussed is critical. This narrative is one product from that meeting, summarizing several presentations from the workshop.

Indexed as

biomarkermeasurementpainPain in Animals Workshoptranslational

Identifiers

PMID40919438
PMCPMC12408590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.