ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
Reconstructing patient level survival data from published Kaplan-Meier curves.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Necrosis following neoadjuvant radiotherapy and its association with oncological outcome in soft tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Reconstructing Pseudo Individual Patient-Level Data From Published Survival Curves in Cardiovascular Trials.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Progression-Free Survival with PARP Inhibitors According to Clinical Risk in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: An Indirect Comparison Using Reconstructed Data.Oncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Individual-level patient data (IPD) are helpful for designing clinical trials, conducting meta-analyses, or methodology research. However, such patient level data are not readily available. Multiple methods have been developed for reconstructing survival data using published Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves. There has been no practical guidance on an optimal approach or extensive evaluation of the performance of the approach. Methods: We reviewed several methods of extracting the coordinates of KM survival curves and reconstructing individual-level survival data. Then, we reproduced data from 46 published KM curves. The accuracy of reconstructed data is quantified by comparing hazard ratios (HRs) and their confidence intervals (CIs) estimated from the reproduced data with those reported in the original papers. Results: The comparison showed a high degree of similarity between the reproduced and original HRs and CIs. In most cases, the differences were less than 5 %. The mean and median absolute percentage differences of 58 reconstructed HRs were 2.85 % and 2.14 %, respectively. These results suggest the reconstruction method reliably reconstructs survival data from KM survival curves. Conclusions: Based on an extensive number of reconstructions, we demonstrated that reconstructed data provided similar estimates overall to those from published papers. The quality of the reproduced data depends on the presence of noise in the published curves and whether the preprocessing step is properly done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.