Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919409›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

Neural substrates associated with irrelevant information suppression in problem-solving: an fMRI study of the Remote Associates Test.

Reiji Ohkuma, Yuto Kurihara, Rieko Osu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reiji OhkumaGraduate School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Yuto KuriharaFaculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Rieko OsuFaculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suppressing irrelevant information during problem-solving is vital. Misleading or unrelated information may hinder the performance. However, previous studies inferred suppression-related brain regions based on overall problem-solving or pre-solution neural activity, resulting in insufficient experimental control over the precise timing of suppression and the types of information requiring suppression. In this study, we presented different types of distractors when introducing a problem to examine neural activity associated with suppressing unnecessary information. Participants completed the Japanese version of the Remote Associates Test in an MRI scanner under three conditions: strongly misleading, weakly related, and no distractors. Before the experiment, the participants were informed about the distractors and instructed to ignore them when the problem was presented. The findings showed that stronger suppression demands at problem onset increased the activation of the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Furthermore, the IFG activity, initiated at the beginning of the problem, decreased gradually rather than toward obtaining a solution to the presented problem. These findings suggest that the bilateral IFG supports problem-solving by suppressing irrelevant information.

Indexed as

distractorfMRIproblem-solvingRemote Associates Testsuppression

Identifiers

PMID40919409
PMCPMC12408633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.