ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Training load and injury surveillance in Leinster SChoolboy RUgby players: the SCRUm cohort study.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe training loads and injury incidences, and explore their relationship in senior schoolboy rugby players in Leinster, Ireland. Methods: Prospective cohort study conducted during the 2019-2020 season. Methods aligned with consensus statements for rugby injury surveillance research. Injuries were coded using the Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) version 10.1 and recorded using the World Rugby Injury Surveillance System. Training load measures (session type, duration and rate of perceived exertion) were recorded by the players using The Sports Office smartphone application. Results: In total, 463 participants (mean age 17, (SD=0.9 years)) in 16 schools provided data over 20 weeks. Injury incidence per 1000 player hours was 19.9 (95% CI: 15.2 to 25.6) match injuries and 0.7 (95% CI: 0.4 to 1.0) training injuries. Median injury severity was 22 days (95% CI: 17 to 28) lost for match injuries and 14 days (95% CI: 5 to 41) lost for training injuries. Frequent injury sites included shoulder (n=23, 27%), head (n=22, 26%), wrist/hand (n=9, 11%), ankle (n=8, 10%) and knee (n=5, 6%). Tackle accounted for 49% of injuries. Players' recording of individual training load showed 11.5% compliance. Exposure was calculated as 31 141 training hours and 3063 match hours. Training sessions included conditioning weights (31%), rugby skills: non-contact (28%) and semicontact (24%), with variation in proportion of sessions across schools. Conclusion: Match activity and tackle events accounted for most injuries. Training exposure and type varied widely across schools. Low compliance in recorded individual training load limited analysis of association with injury risk, highlighting the challenge in identifying injury risk factors in an adolescent cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.