ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Heartbeat detection and personal authentication using a 60 GHz Doppler sensor.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microwave Doppler sensors, capable of detecting minute physiological movements, enable the measurement of biometric information, such as walking patterns, heart rate, and respiration. Unlike fingerprint and facial recognition systems, they offer authentication without physical contact or privacy concerns. This study focuses on non-contact seismocardiography using microwave Doppler sensors and aims to apply this technology for biometric authentication. Method: We proposed a method for authenticating and identifying heartbeat signals through supervised learning using a conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE). A 60 GHz microwave Doppler sensor was used to capture heartbeat signals, which were processed using a conformer network to detect peaks and segment individual beats. High signal-to-noise ratio waveforms were selected, and time-frequency analysis extracted relevant features. Spectrograms labeled with subject data were input into the CVAE, which encoded subject-specific features into a latent space for authentication. Results: The proposed heartbeat-based authentication method, validated on 13 subjects, achieved an average balanced accuracy of 97.3% for authentication and an average accuracy of 94.7% for identification. Compared with conventional methods, this approach demonstrated superior performance by effectively encoding subject-specific features while mitigating noise-related challenges. Conclusion: The proposed method enhanced the feasibility of non-contact heartbeat-based authentication by achieving high accuracy while addressing noise-related challenges. Its application could improve biometric security without compromising user privacy. Further advancements in handling posture variations and scalability are essential for real-world implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.