ArticleEnvironment and planning. B, urban analytics and city science2025
Exploring the relationship between daytime and nighttime mobility and park visitation: A case study of Austin, TX.
Article in Environment and planning. B, urban analytics and city science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban green space disparities persist amid rapid urbanization, widening the supply-demand gap between parks and developed area. Population density is a critical determinant in estimating park visitors, defining suitable park locations, and allocating facilities for park accessibility. Conventionally, population density data were used as a foundational basis for urban green space planning decisions, often derived from sources like the US Census Bureau, primarily reflecting "nighttime residential" distribution. However, this approach fails to capture the dynamic urban life where daily routines and mobility significantly shape park usage. This study bridges this gap by exploring the relationship between daytime and nighttime mobility patterns and their influence on park visitations across diverse park types during weekdays, using Austin, TX as study area. Methodologically, we employ a fixed effects regression analysis integrating longitudinal data from SafeGraph for park visitation and LandScan USA for daytime-to-nighttime population density ratios, within 1 km buffers around each park. Control variables encompass socio-economic factors at the block group scale, park attributes, and weather conditions. Findings suggest that neighborhood and pocket parks demonstrate positive associations with daytime population density, while district and metropolitan parks exhibit stronger ties with nighttime population density. Further, median age, unemployment rate, and higher education attainment exhibit positive correlations with park visitation, especially during daytime. Park amenities, especially playgrounds and water features, significantly contribute to increased visitation across all park types. The findings offer valuable guidance for policymakers and urban planners, informing the reimagining of park distribution strategies, optimizing facilities, and fostering inclusive park spaces accessibility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.