ArticleBiologics : targets & therapy2025
Comparative Cancer Incidence by Organ Site in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Janus Kinase Inhibitors versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: A Retrospective Real-World Cohort Analysis.
Article in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Frontiers in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Emerging Research and Unmet Needs in Pharmacologic Management.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aim to evaluate the malignancy risk between Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) users and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) users in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, using a large real-world electronic health record database (TriNetX). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified adult RA patients initiating JAKi or TNFi therapy between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, within the TriNetX global federated network. The hazard ratio (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) of incident-specific cancers, overall cancer incidence, and all-cause mortality, were calculated between the propensity score matched JAKi and TNFi cohorts. The probability of the outcome of interest was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: After propensity score matching, there were 4045 each in JAKi or TNFi user cohorts. The mean (standard deviation) age was 57.7 (13.3) and 57.6 (13.9) years, 81.4% and 80.8% were female, and median (interquartile range) follow-up time 3.69 (2.61) years vs 3.69 (2.68) years, in the JAKi and the TNFi cohorts, respectively. No significant differences were observed in risks of overall cancer incidence and all-cause mortality between the two cohorts. JAKi users had a reduced risk of incident digestive organ cancers compared with TNFi users (adjusted HR: 0.599, 95% CI: 0.439-0.817), mainly observed among females. The risks of incident respiratory and intrathoracic organs cancers were increased in JAKi users compared to TNFi users among females (adjusted HR: 2.582, 95% CI: 1.109-6.011) but not in males. Conclusion: In a large real-world database, we did not find an increased risk of overall cancer incidence in JAKi compared to TNFi users among RA patients. JAKi users had a lower risk of incident digestive organs cancers, and a higher risk of respiratory cancer in females, when compared with TNFi users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.