Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919270›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2025

Thoracic aortic injury as a complication of spinal surgery: A new case and systematic review (1991-2024).

Marcus Vinicius Borges, Caio Focassio, Adriano Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcus Vinicius BorgesFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo-FCMSCSP, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caio FocassioFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo-FCMSCSP, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adriano GomesFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Alagoas, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Alagoas, Alagoas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Iatrogenic thoracic aortic injury (TAI) is a rare but well-recognized complication of spine surgery, lacking standardized treatment guidelines due to its rarity and variability of manifestations. Methods: We present a new case of TAI successfully managed with endovascular repair and systematically reviewed 52 articles (1991-2024) reporting 64 cases, including demographics, surgical indications, injury patterns, and treatments. Results: A 53-year-old man with a T7 fracture underwent posterior spinal instrumentation and developed chest pain due to a combination of impingement and screw penetration into the thoracic aorta and was treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and removal of pedicle screws. The review (n = 64; mean age, 50 years; 48% male and 48% female) identified vertebral fractures (42.2%), spinal deformities (31.3%), and posterior approaches (70%) as predominant risk factors. Injuries included thoracic aorta penetration (53%), impingement (21.9%), combined injuries (21.9%), and other rare events (3.2%), with median diagnosis at 31 to 34 months. Treatments comprised TEVAR (51.6%), open repair (31.3%), and conservative management (17.2%). Posterior approaches significantly increased injury risk ( Conclusions: TAI often presents late, requiring surveillance. TEVAR is effective, although open repair remains vital in select cases. This review informs management strategies for this rare complication.

Indexed as

Aortic impingementInjuryScrew penetrationSpinal surgeryThoracic aorta

Identifiers

PMID40919270
PMCPMC12410477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.